A quality improvement program for managing clozapine-induced constipation in a long-term structured residential setting for persons with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to increase awareness of the serious medical consequences of clozapine-associated constipation to front line nursing staff and patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: The QIP was developed iteratively by psychiatric nurses, psychiatrists and pharmacists with input from patients. The processes involved a literature review, development of educational materials for staff and patients, and the creation of a daily bowel movements log (BML). Implementation involved review of the BML at treatment team meetings, and deployment of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to resolve constipation and increase awareness and knowledge of this clinical concern. OUTCOMES: The initial pilot screened for symptoms of constipation in patients receiving clozapine and non-clozapine antipsychotic agents and intervening as necessary during multidisciplinary team meetings. Patients benefited from relief of constipation and improved bowel habits. Staff benefited from improved knowledge and making requisite changes in workflow and practice. Feedback allowed refinements to be made to the educational materials for patients and staff. Since full implementation, bowel habits are routinely monitored, and interventions are reviewed for effectiveness. Staff satisfaction with this QIP is reflected in answers to a structured questionnaire and in patient reports (n = 50). CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine, the only approved and efficacious medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia is significantly underutilized. Medically consequential constipation can be a serious barrier to retention of patients benefiting from clozapine. Increased awareness and use of educational materials for patients and staff, routine monitoring of bowel habits combined with pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can successfully address this clinical problem.

Applying Shared Decision Making to the Process of Medication Deprescribing in Schizophrenia.

Deprescribing, the identification and discontinuation of medications that are no longer indicated or that cause adverse effects that outweigh clinical benefit, relies on the integration of clinical expertise and patient values using shared decision making (SDM). This case series describes the application of SDM to the process of deprescribing in patients with serious mental illness, illustrating the ways in which SDM builds a therapeutic alliance between patient, psychiatrist, family members, and other health care professionals to collaboratively develop treatment plans.

Less is more: Deprescribing anticholinergic medications in persons with severe mental illness.

BACKGROUND: Long-term prescribing of anticholinergic medications (ACM) for antipsychotic-associated extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) is not recommended, yet is widely prevalent. Adverse effects of ACM include memory impairment, dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, urinary retention, and tachycardia, which can seriously impact quality of life. This quality improvement deprescription project sought to reduce chronic ACM use in patients with serious mental illness (SMI). METHODS: Education directed at psychiatrists combined with clinical pharmacy support for deprescription was used to target clinically stable patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder with no EPS and ACM prescriptions of ≥6 months. Scales were used to assess anticholinergic adverse effects, memory impairment, and quality of life. ACMs were tapered and discontinued over 1 to 6 months. RESULTS: More than 75% of targeted patients successfully tapered or discontinued ACM, which coincided with significant improvements in anticholinergic adverse effects, memory impairment, and quality of life. Approximately 10% of patients were restarted on ACM for re-emergent EPS. CONCLUSIONS: For most clinically stable patients with SMI without EPS, our findings suggest that gradual deprescription of chronic ACM is clinically appropriate, well tolerated, and improves quality of life. A randomized trial could provide more definitive answers.

Deprescribing anticholinergic medication in the community mental health setting: A quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Chronic anticholinergic medication (ACM) prescribing with antipsychotics when no longer clinically indicated can lead to serious side effects and adversely impact patient quality of life. OBJECTIVES: Through modifications of previously described deprescribing strategies undertaken in an academic, schizophrenia clinic, this quality improvement (QI) project aimed to bolster ACM deprescription where clinically appropriate among patients with schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders at a community mental health center. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team involving clinical pharmacists and psychiatrists created web streaming video medical education accredited modules, supplemented by small groups sessions and case consultations, and provided these to psychiatrists and nurse practitioners at a community mental health center over a one-year period. Electronic medical record reports were also generated, highlighting patients who were receiving one of two ACM used in the clinic: benztropine and/or trihexyphenidyl; these were periodically distributed to support appropriate deprescription. Patient education infographic material focused on ACM were also created and deployed. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six patients were identified as receiving benztropine or trihexyphenidyl in March 2019. One hundred and six (84%) were on one or both of these medications for at least six months. The mean (±SD) age of the study sample was 53.4 (±12.6) years; a third of the sample was over 60 years. Thirty-seven patients, or 29.4%, had their ACM discontinued or the dosage reduced. Deprescription was not associated with age, sex, race, or diagnosis. Deprescription was not associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy, first versus second generation, or oral versus long acting preparation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that deprescription of ACM in a community mental health center can occur with prescriber education and support. However, results from previous stages of this QI project, where much higher rates of deprescription were demonstrated, indicate the important benefit of more direct clinical pharmacist support and involvement in the process.

Reducing Anticholinergic Medication Burden in Patients With Psychotic or Bipolar Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Anticholinergic medications are prescribed to treat extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) associated with antipsychotics. Anticholinergic medications cause several side effects and can often be withdrawn during the maintenance phase of antipsychotic treatment without EPS reemergence. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce anticholinergic medication burden and improve quality of life in patients with severe mental illness. METHODS: Patients with DSM-IV-TR-diagnosed schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorders in an outpatient psychiatric clinic who were prescribed benztropine were identified, screened for anticholinergic side effects by the treating psychiatrist, and referred to an on-site clinical pharmacist for a comprehensive medication review. Anticholinergic side effects, cognitive impairment, and impact on quality of life were assessed using a Likert scale. Recommendations for potential medication changes were discussed with the prescriber. Initial and follow-up assessments were conducted over 1-8 months to identify improvements in side effects and quality of life. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were assessed from November 2014 to December 2015. Patients were receiving from 1 to 6 medications with anticholinergic properties (median = 3 medications). Of the 29 patients, 19 were recommended for a medication change, with 13 having 1 or more anticholinergic medications discontinued and 6 having the dose decreased. A significant reduction in anticholinergic side effects and improvements in memory and quality of life were observed for these patients (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this interdisciplinary, collaborative QI project, patients whose anticholinergic burden was reduced experienced a significant improvement in side effects, memory, and quality of life.

Exploring the value of clinical pharmacy services for patients with diabetes in safety net settings.

BACKGROUND: The role of the pharmacist in safety net settings has not been well studied, specifically in meeting unmet needs of vulnerable patients with diabetes. OBJECTIVES: To identify unmet management and medication-related needs of patients with diabetes who are receiving care in two distinct underserved practices in Pittsburgh, PA. METHODS: Individual, semi-structured interviews with patients from a free clinic (FC) and a federally qualified community health center (FQHC) in Pittsburgh were conducted. Inclusion criteria included: adults at least 18 years old with uncontrolled diabetes (A1C > 7%) who received health care services from either the FC or the FQHC. Participants completed a short demographic survey and answered questions about their perceptions and attitudes in four thematic areas: (1) self-management of diabetes; (2) medication-related needs; (3) the role of the pharmacist in their care; and (4) how pharmacists can be better integrated in their diabetes management. Transcripts were analyzed using principles of Grounded Theory. RESULTS: Twenty-nine interviews were conducted: 15 participants were from the FC, and 14 were from the FQHC. Five main themes emerged from each site including: patients experience challenges managing their diabetes, patients identify the emotional struggle associated with living with diabetes, patients feel that they are "on their own" to care for their diabetes, patients desire a personal and caring relationship with their pharmacist, and patients value a pharmacist who is knowledgeable about diabetes care. CONCLUSIONS: These results will help provide guidance to pharmacists working in safety net settings who are interested in expanding clinical pharmacy services for patients with diabetes.

Comparison of active-learning strategies for motivational interviewing skills, knowledge, and confidence in first-year pharmacy students.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 3 strategies for pharmacy student learning of motivational interviewing skills, knowledge of motivational interviewing principles, and confidence in and attitudes toward their application. DESIGN: Following a motivational interviewing lecture, first-year students were randomized to perform practice activities (written dialogue, peer role-play, or mock-patient counseling activities). Motivational interviewing skills, knowledge, confidence, and attitudes were measured. ASSESSMENT: All students demonstrated improvement in skills, knowledge, and confidence. Students in the mock-patient counseling group demonstrated significantly better motivational interviewing skills during practice and trended toward higher scores on the summative evaluation. They also demonstrated a significant improvement in knowledge compared with that of the written dialogue group during practice. Feedback at the end was generally positive, with students expressing recognition for the value of motivational interviewing. CONCLUSIONS: Students demonstrated their best performance of motivational interviewing during assessments using interactions with mock or standardized patients.